Hitlary, et al.Says It's Disgusting and Reprehensible

I finally saw some of this much ballyhooed video, The Innocence of Islam.  It is disgusting and reprehensible, as the truth often is.  The fourteen minute trailer that I viewed didn't show me much of anything that I hadn't read and/or seen before, from other sources.  Beyond being a baseborn bastard child, much like our present President; a man-whore/kept man for an older, wealthy widow woman, much like our last losing Demoncat Presidential candidate; a warmongering leader of illiterates, much like most every Demoncat President in the last century;  a fifty something year old molester of teen aged girls, much like our last previous Demoncat President; and an extortionist, like most every politician we've elected in my lifetime, the one new offering in this film is that Muhammed, Mohammad, whatever, was unabashedly bisexual.  If true, as is probable, due to the evolutionary level of the era, it is a safe bet that Mohammad 'the master', was always the 'top' in any and every male/male encounter.  Maybe that's why we hear of sodomization of the conquered in so many Muslim conquests of infidels, as in the case of our ambassador, Chris Stephenson.  Maybe that's why the most hits on homosexual male porn sites come from the Muslim Middle East. 
Using this film as a false excuse to foment murder and mayhem is much more of an atrocity than the film itslef.  If Christians and Jews used the same rationale, millions could and should have been killed in response to and in retaliation for such slanders as the taxpayer subsidized 'work of art', "PissChrist" or the "It's a Jew egg" line from the movie Borat, as well the actual atrocities of the perpetual persecution of Coptic Christians in Egypt, the on-going rockets and bombs in Israel and the ever voluminous threats from Adolph, Jr. in Iran to "wipe Israel off the map." 
As mankind of a millennium ago was pretty much totally devoted to the basics of feeding, f^(#ing and fighting, it is no surprise that an overly ambitious man like Mohammad was really into those activities, especially the f^(#ing and fighting.  With the fervor and fury with which he approached any and every endeavor, he'd engage in those favorites in an all inclusive manner, with no regard to such minutia as gender or age, especially in matters of sex and enslavement.
Similarly scurrilous statements can be, have been, and continue to be spouted about the founding figures of the planet's other two major religions.  Jesus was of questionable parentage of legitimacy, consorted with at least one prostitute, who perhaps birthed a baseborn baby by him and he had a male follower whom he especially 'loved'.  Moses was perhaps the progeny of incest and grew to be a crazy old man of drug induced, hallucinatory insanity.  But you don't read or hear about Jews or Christians rising up in murderous mobs in response to such meaningless assininities, do you?
From each of these historical figures came a philosophy, a belief system, a political structure with which to control mass populations.  Over the course of their histories, these religions have all utilized the force of mayhem and murder to achieve their means and ends.  Over that span of time, Judaism and Christianity have reformed, so as to no longer rely on violent and vehement conquest for conversions and conformations to the particular practice.  Islam, on the other hand, holds to the traditional tirades of "the prophet", which were nothing more than a mash-up of The Torah and The New Testament, with a bit of his own ideas for personal political power.  Make no mistake.  From its founding, Islam has been a political organization posing as religion, seeking subjugation of all, where no one dares to so much as declare a disagreement with the authority of Islam.  For those supposed ninety per cent of 'moderate' Muslims who disagree with the supposed ten per cent of the 'radicalized' those among you, you better start disagreeing with them to the points of denunciation and destruction, or others will do it for you, destroying all one hundred per cent of you.

• 
                                           Not a lot of difference in these two Mohamads,  centuries apart, besides the beard and the weaponry.  Of course, Atta only shaved his beard as a matter of modern military tactics.