So, Why Did Herman Cain Quit?

It was said that it was because the turmoil caused by all of these accusatory women were causing too much pain to his wife, Gloria and their family.  Gloria and the rest of the Cains need to stop and remember the pain, anguish and sacrifice that Abigail Adams, John Quincy Adams and the rest of the Adams children endured when her husband and their father, John was helping to establish this Republic.  Besides being away from them so much for such lengths of time, even when he was home, John Adams was perhaps one of the most cursed and reviled by so many colonial Americans. 
Mark Twain said that a well told lie will trump the truth most every time and will most often live on and on.  And just because more than one person tells the same or a similar lie does not make it true.  Now that Cain has taken himself out of the race, the truth behind these allegations will probably never come out.  With his exit from the race, the lies are no longer front page news.  I have always acquiesced that most men are absolute mutts who will do and/or say most anything to get sex.  Herman Cain is not most men.
Herman Cain is an American Negroid man  who came up during a time when wide spread and systemic racism, bigotry and prejudice abounded and flourished.  He overcame those obstacles individually and on his own with an innate intelligence and integrity along with an acquired work ethic that let him academically excel and vocationally succeed.  Those qualities got him into and through college, studying real academic disciplines, rather than using affirmative action programs and majoring in any one of the bitterness studies curricula like law or any of the other social sciences.  He studied and excelled in real sciences, like mathematics and physics.
When Herman Cain began his campaign, he said it was to win, though all of the prognosticators said he had no chance.  But when those establishmentarians saw that Cain's affable and amiable demeanor and his breathtakingly bold policy ideas were resulting in soaring support, they had to come up with something to squash and quash them and him.  Herman Cain had become more than an easily dismissed curiosity, like Lyndon LaRouche.  He had become a viable, believable candidate with a positive message of real hope and meaningful change who engaged, inflamed and energized people, like Ross Perot.  On the campaign trail and the debate stage, Cain was building and receiving support as the committed conservative in the vein of Ronald Reagan who could and would unite the party faithful, regardless of their faction within the party and who could and would invite the independents and the unaffiliateds to help rid the Republic of a dangerous  Dummycrap/Demoncat despot, as Reagan did.
Since he isn't a mealy-mouthed, wishy-washy, flip-flopping professional politician who could be easily demagogued by the politics of personal destruction with a personal political past, another way would have to be used.  His private sector professional life was a lifetime career of highly regarded, respected and responsible upwardly mobile  success and his private, personal life was that of a faith based, God-fearing family man committed to his spouse and progeny.  Though not necessarily done easily, it would be easy enough for the professional liars who are our present day professional politicians and their pay rolled poltroons to bury the truth of a good man's life under a blanket of total bull crap and balderdash to such an extent that it became believable to too many gullible rubes, as Twain said....
What better way to slander and libel a Negroid gentleman than have some gold-digging Caucasoid c#^+$ swear that he was sexually inappropriate with them.  Has anyone ever read To Kill a Mockingbird?  Let's start with the two unnamed shrews with the harassment complaints at the National Restaurant Association.   Cain almost got his response right in answering the allegations put out by perhaps the most profanely progressive publication since...well, since time began.  He said, "Yes, I was accused of sexual harassment.  And falsely accused, I might add."  At that point, he should have changed the period to a comma and added, "as were so many men during that time in American history."  And his explanation of the cases being  investigated and settled by the association's general counsel and HR department should have made the point much more precisely that these cases, like so many cases of their kind were so settled as it was easier and more economically feasible to pay off these money grubbers than to prove Cain's innocence.  Because of his amiable and affable personality, along with his trusting and even naive nature, Herman Cain is a relatively easy mark for wampum wanting wenches and witches.  The tale told by Donna Donella is a prime example of that.  An erstwhile exchange twisted by a woman seeking her fifteen minutes of fame, as well as perhaps her thirty pieces of silver.  There is no perhaps with Sharon Bialek.  She is a paid-off complainant with no complaint.  Appearing with the ultimate femma-nazi slug of a solicitor, she accused Cain of the more serious, quid pro quo  type of harassment.  This bimbo will be proven to have been bankrolled by Baracka, as the President and his minions were quickly coming to recognize that Herman Cain would spank his half bred butt bloody in the general election.   This harlot, this prostitute, with her history of bankruptcies, evictions and lawsuits and her residential proximity to Obama's chief advisor David Axelrod are just coincidental.  A woman would never make up such a story as this if it weren't true, would she?  You damned right she would.
 Just like fortune seeking femme fatale,  Ginger White.  As the harassment hokum was getting no on-going traction, her payers, probably the Romney campaign, prompted her to proclaim an affair story.    I know that her tale is an outright, outlandish lie.  Her quote that Herman said that she was beautiful to him is hogwash.  I have a lot lower standards of feminine beauty than Herman Cain does and I see  NOTHING beautiful or even remotely attractive about this bimbo.  With the same type of financial troubles and woes as Bialek, Ginger White took advantage of a dearly nice and innocently naive man by taking money from him and now, years later, is turning that truth into a travesty of false witnessing.  There has to be a special place in hell for these harlots.  I have to hope so, anyway.  Not only have they ruined a good man's reputation, they have killed my country.
So, with the only negatives about him being such transparent fabrications, why did Herman quit and not continue on to what would have been the nomination and the Presidency?  One of two reasons, either of which makes me a conspiracy theorist.  The whole campaign could have been a farce from the start, so as to position himself as a political commentator/analyst and to establish his SuperPac, Cain Connections, from both of which he will get even richer than he already is, though not so much like a Rockefeller or a Rockefeller Repulsican like Romney.   Stating the second possibility really makes me a nut job conspiracy theorist.  Like I pondered about Perot in '92, I can't help but wonder if MIB, so to speak, spoke with Herman and maybe also Gloria, to let them know that character assassination isn't their only known form of assassination.  We'll probably never know, just as there shall always be questions about JFK.  I would say that maybe our grand- or great grandchildren might someday learn the truth of the matter.  But as Herman Cain was truly our last best hope for saving my country, that truth shall surely die with the nation.
                         

A Rose Is a Rose That Is Not a Rose

Whether fighting or French kissing, they're both TWO EVILS!

George Washington knew the dangers of organized political parties.  Though he recognized the reality of people's tendencies to organize and operate in groups like political parties, he more importantly saw that every government regards political parties as enemies.  They are too apt to engage in such acts as exacting revenge on their opponents, through alternating domination, becoming and being a frightful despotism leading at length, to a more formal and permanent despotism, based in the politics of personal destruction.  Washington warned that the party system serves to distract the public councils, enfeeble the public administration, and agitate the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms while kindling the animosities of one against another and opening the door to foreign influence and corruption.
Now, two hundred and some odd years later, those prophecies have come to pass, as the governance of the United States is embroiled in non-productive in-fighting of an entrenched two party system, though there are approximately seventy-some organized parties throughout America.  There's a dozen or so with the word socialist or communist in the name of the party.  Many people are labeled as Independents, without specifying whether they're members of the Independent American Party, the American Independent Party or the Independence Party, or if they are, like this writer, Unaffiliated with any party.
But most voters only know D's and R's.  Quite often at election times, there is talk of and actual 'third party' candidates.  It is easy to overlook and ignore that there is almost always in contemporary American politics, additional candidates with G's and L's and other letters after their names.  Though they have little, or more accurately, no chance of winning an election, they do, quite often affect the outcome between the R's and the D's, as Green Party Presidential candidate Ralph Nader did in 2000 and as Libertarian gubernatorial candidate Mike Munger did in North Carolina in 2008 and as third party candidates allowed Bill Clinton two  non-majority wins in the 1990's.
But let's talk about just the D's and the R's and the odd little names this writer has devised to describe the various types of people within each party.
Within the modern Democratic Party are true Democrats in the vein of Harry Truman and Jack Kennedy and the voters who elected them.  But much more numerous are Demoncats; mostly shyster, charlatan lawyers turned professional political party putzes purely possessed by overwhelming ambition for personal power.  Blinded by that quest for political power, Demoncats have lost sight of the party's original center-left vision of social liberalism and progressivism with strict Constitutional adherence and abhorrence of wealthy, moneyed interests.  They now envision a Utopian view favoring total left socialism with absolute ignorance of constitutionality.   Then there are the Dummycraps, those who mindlessly, with a mob mentality, support the Demoncats, just because they have a D after their names.  There was a time in America when the word Democrat was a horrible epithet meaning one who panders to the masses.  Since the time of Woodrow Wilson, the man pictured on the $100,000 bill, democracy has been the catch word for what America is, or, at least, is supposed to be.  Nothing could further from the truth.  The founders and framers knew that democracy is but a polite term for mob rule, where a majority could subjugate the rights of a minority with a simple 51 to 49 vote.
Republicans are supposed to be a constitutionally conservative party which advocates for small, limited government and the rights of the individual through the rule of law.  But like Demoncats, too many have become Repulsicans, reveling in their own avarice for big government and personal political power.  These Repulsicans are those who make up the party establishment of Rockefeller, Romney, Boehner,  et al.  The recent emergence of The Tea Party as an opposition faction within the party may be the party's and the nation's last best hope for saving the Republic from further and total demise.  And as there are Dummycraps who fall right into line with their Demoncat masters, there are Rebooblicans, like my late father, who blindly believe whatever the party bosses say.
As for the Libertarians, the party with which I was affiliated for decades, they have become too much like the Demoncats and Repulsicans to become the Liebertarians, willing to tell any untruth to gain political power, missing the party's message of absolute minimal governmental scope and authority and maximum individual rights and liberty.
It is time, it is past time to outlaw organized political parties, even through Constitutional amendment, if necessary.  If a citizen wishes to run for public office, it should be his or her individual ambition, and not part of a largely anonymous, larger group's quest.