First and foremost, I did not watch a second of the vice presidential debate. Much like Her Highness Hitlary and Princess Pelosi, I can take Comrade Kamala only n very small doses.
And I didn't wat to wind up throwing something through the screen of my sixty inch Mitsubishi Electric. I did listen to about the last half on the radio in my company work truck. I figured that I could more easily refrain from destroying company property, like the radio in the truck, even though I did buy and install it.
From what I heard, Vice President Pence represented himself and the campaign admirably and efficiently. But there were two instances where I felt he settled for a field goal when he could have run all the way downfield for a ball spiking touchdown.
Though I couldn't see, I could well envision the California kook striking a haughty, hands on hips pose as she declared with fake feminine indignation, in the voice of an entitled, spoiled brat bitch girl child, "I'm speaking! I'm speaking!" In at least one of those indignant instances, Vice President Pence should have, in his usual calm and collected manner simply stated, "No, Kamala, you're not. You're propagandizing. You're prevaricating. To put it bluntly, you're lying through your pretty pearly whites. I can not and will not allow you to do so without calling you out on it. You are showing, once again, that you are the epitome of lackey liberal, lying, cheating, thieving conniving, shyster, charlatan lawyer turned professional political party pipik."
There is another point that Pence should have driven home in a more dramatic and truthful response to Kamala's assertion that "Trump lost the trade war with China." Vice-President Pence should have pointed out that President Trump won the trade war so convincingly that Chairman Xi's only response was to unleash a terrible biological weapon on us (US) and the rest of the world designed with the primary purpose of at least crippling capitalist economies. This attack was launched with the full compliance of the modern Demoncat party, with Joe Biden as their point man and with the full cooperation of the progressive, propagandist prevaricating press, like the medium moderating this debate.
The other instance in which I think that Pence should have and could have had a better answer was in responding to the final question submitted by Utah junior high school student Brecklynn Brown.
The modern Demoncat party is not the party of your grandfather, Brecklynn, Jack Kennedy is the last truly American Democrat president. Every president and presidential candidate with a D behind his or her name has been some form of fascist or socialist, including the current candidates. Therein lies the problem. Up to 1960, with the exceptions of the 30's and 40's, the political debate was a contest between socially and economically conservative and liberal capitalism. Since LBJ's Great Society program, it has become a conflict between overall capitalism and fascism/socialism. Within that is the true simplicity of politics. Socio-economic, or political systems boil down to those three basic philosophies. Every other system one might name is a subset of one of those three. To the far left is socialism, wherein the means of production and distribution are publicly (governmentally) owned and operated. More toward the center, but still leftist, as it is a statist system, is fascism, wherein the means of production and distribution are privately owned, but publicly (governmentally) operated. To the right of center is capitalism, where the means of production and distribution is privately owned and privately operated. So, instead of honest debate over the various forms of constitutional capitalism, we are now faced with the ferocity of polar opposite politics of collectivist or individualist governance."
A better reply would have been something along the lines of:
Brecklynn, the answer to your great question is to be found in the failures and fallacies of the American political party system and party politics in general, about which President George Washington warned us in his farewell address, when he wrote, "the common and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party are sufficient to make it the interest and duty of a wise people to discourage and restrain it.
It serves always to distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration. It agitates the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which finds a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions. Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.
There is an opinion that parties in free countries are useful checks upon the administration of the government and serve to keep alive the spirit of liberty. This within certain limits is probably true; and in governments of a monarchical cast, patriotism may look with indulgence, if not with favor, upon the spirit of party. But in those of the popular character, in governments purely elective, it is a spirit not to be encouraged.
Brecklynn, we can see this so clearly in the on going riots, looting, arson and other acts of violence being perpetrated by members of the modern American left.
It is evidenced by the Demoncats' consistent and continuing coup attempts. We can see it in the sway and influence of foreign nations like Russia has demonstrated over Demoncat politicians like Hitlary Clinton and Baracka Hussein Obama, not to mention Baracka Hussein O's capitulation and kowtowing to Islamic terrorists. We are witness to the influence that the Chinese Communist Party has exercised and continues to exercise over Demoncats like China Joe Biden and Arizona senatorial candidate Mark Kelly.
No comments:
Post a Comment