The Expert Consultants Agree With Me Re Romney's VP

It is being widely reported that a  Repulsican official familiar with the thinking of the Romney campaign says that the Governor is seeking an incredibly boring white guy to be his Vice-Presidential running mate.   There are a lot of names being bandied about, including that of my own home state's well regarded and respected Sen. Richard Burr.  Vanity Fair published a 'short' list of potentials that is anything but short.  At the top of that list, and I mean at the very top is the man whom I said weeks ago should be Romney's VP.  That man is Arizona's good senator, Jon Kyl.
  JON KYL 4 VICE-PRESIDENT
I picked this man not because he's a boring white guy, which, by and large, he is.  I didn't pick him for geographical balance, which he does provide, by being from a state that is pretty much at the country's opposite diagonal corner from Romney's Massachusetts.  I did pick him, in part, for political/philosophical balance, as National Journal  rates him as the Senate's fourth most conservative Repulsican and because Romney is still having problems convincing the base that he himself is conservative on his own merits.  Gov. Romney can surely sense the good sense in picking a running mate with these ticket balancing qualities, much like Jack Kennedy did in 1960.  However, Gov. Romney would not have to worry about this man's personal political ambitions assassinating him.  Sen. Kyl is retiring this cycle and not seeking a fourth term in the Senate, which he would surely win if he were running for reelection.  He has been quoted as saying that he has no higher political aspirations, like the Presidency, a Cabinet post or high ambassadorship.  But he couched that by adding that he would be open to serving as Vice-President with the right President and under the right circumstances.  I can't imagine a righter President or a more right set of circumstances to whom and to which to offer his experience and expertise.
I picked Jon Kyl because he is imminently most qualified for the job of Vice-President among all of the incredibly boring white guys being discussed by the observing pundits,  as well as perhaps by the participating politician and his hack consultants and advisers. He is also most and best qualified among non-boring, non-male and non-Caucasoid candidates who may be considered or are being considered.
The Constitution says the Vice-President has two things to do.  The foremost, found in Article II Section 6, is to be ready to have the powers and duties of the Presidency devolve upon him if the President is unable to discharge those powers and duties, because of removal or resignation from office, death, or inability.  It is highly unlikely that this part of the job would ever come up.  But because it might, it is a sensible extrapolation that the Vice-President should be a close confidant and consultant to the President.  Though only one Vice-President in recent history and perhaps in all of the country's history has had such standing, Kyl would be a good man to have help formulate and implement the most important policies of this next administration.  Because of his specific committee experience in the Senate in areas such as security, finance and the judiciary, Kyl would be an excellent adviser to the President on these contemporarily vital issues.
The one on-going duty that the Constitution assigns to the Vice-President is to preside over the Senate and to cast tie breaking votes in that chamber.  This November's elections are going to give us a Senate which will be almost, or perhaps exactly evenly divided in terms of parties and/or political philosophy.  Kyl has held leadership positions for much of his eighteen years in the Senate, including his present posting as Minority Whip, making him the second ranking Repulsican, responsible for his party's members' attendance and persuading them to vote in such and such a way.  Time magazine listed him as one of its 100 most influential people in the world for his persuasive role in the Senate.  That persuasive nature, coupled with his specific experience in important policy areas and his potential conservative vote would be vital to the country's survival when the Senate considers such matters as repealing Obamacare (or should we call it Soetorocare?),  Dodd-Frank, and any myriad other rules, regs, and laws handed down from on high by this current socialist regime and by similar previous others.  He would be instrumental in getting the Senate to 'do right' in such matters as tax reform, immigration, border protection and homeland security, as well as getting proper Justices approved for the Supreme Court. 
Of course, selecting Jon Kyl to be the Vice-Presidential running mate will have little or no real impact upon the campaign in and of itself.   To truly engage the base, to interest the independents, and to take it to Soetoro and his fellow socialists, Romney needs to name Newt Gingrich as his Secretary of State and Herman Cain as his Secretary of Commerce at the same time he proclaims Kyl to be VP.  He can wait until later to name the rest of his Cabinet, as I proposed them in an earlier article.  But he needs, needs, needs to get those two out on the campaign trail in official capacities to verbally take down the despots dirtying up and destroying our White House.

             NEWT                                         HERMAN CAIN
             
      Sec. of State                                  Sec. of Commerce

I'm Embarrassed By NC Again

As the last in a line of North Carolinians that goes back beyond the American Revolution, I harbor deep feelings for this state and its people.  Sometimes, I am as proud as proud can be.  Then, there are weeks like this one, coming just a couple of weeks after a majority of state voters confirmed that North Carolina is, even if the country isn't, a theocracy.
NC is in the national news again in a triple jeopardy situation.  I am so ashamed.

                     
Firstly, we have Tonya Dixon-Neely, the hyphenatedly named, hyphenated American, who is supposed to be a proud member of the 'profession' of teaching.  But like so many current ill informed, ill educated, probably ill conceived, illiberal liberal 'educators' who indoctrinate rather than instruct, Dixon-Neely has shown herself to be an Obamabotic ignoramus,  like the grand majority of union protected, government school indoctrinaires.
Besides being union protected, Dixon-Neely is doubly protected, being Negroid.  She is supposedly being 'punished' by being suspended.  As it is a suspension  with pay, I am sure that this dumb mass Dummycrap is having a grand vacation, at the taxpayers' expense, reveling over how she's getting over.   The student invloved, nor his parents want Dixon-Neely fired.  Well, I DO!!!  And I want her barred from working in ANY tax payer supported school for all time.  I don't even want her working as a custodian or cafeterian.   This kind of Marxist mush head has no business being in contact with students in an institution of learning.
I really wish that I hadn't finally found that one picture that I was able to find of Dixon-Neely.  She appears to be a bright and beautiful woman.  But appearances do deceive, don't they?  I would love to have been able, in good conscience, to post the following image which I found, labeled as "a composite of what Tonya Dixon-Neely or any other mindless Obama-bot teacher might look like".  It is amazingly close to what I pictured in my mind before finding the one image of her that I could find, which makes her look more like a prostitute than a teacher.

mak
As Dixon-Neely is in a protected class within a protected class, there are those who are already coming to the defense of her indefensibility.  And they show their continuing and constant stupidity by misspelling their new found heroine's name. 


  

Secondly, we have this kooky, Caucasoid Christian preacher advocating that we lock up the lesbians and homosexuals inside an electrified fence until they die off.  This type of ignorance is even stupider than that of Dixon-Neely's.  As a North Carolinian, as a Caucasoid and as a past preacher, I am mortified to have anything in common with Charles Worley.  He exemplifies everything that is ignorant, unknowing, unaware, unacquainted, unapprised, unconversant, uninformed, uncultivated, unversed, uninstructed, untaught, uninitiated, untutored, unschooled, unguided, unenlightened and witless. I do wonder if he doth protest too much? 
In all of the years of ed-you-ka-shun to which I know that these two 'professional' people were exposed, were neither of them exposed to proper English?  Of course, in Dixon-Neely's case, that is known as "white English", so we's not sposed to dis her by axin bout that kind of thang.  And I thought that my drunken, hung over Negroid high school science teacher, from whom the class learned nothing but how to quietly play rummy on the board was bad. 



Of course, the epitome of embarrassment is John Edwards.  I still feel the guilt of knowing that he is all my fault.  I humbly and whole heartedly apologize to my fellow North Carolinians and Americans.  If I hadn't squandered and screwed up my youth, I would have been in position in 1998 to take that Senate seat as a Libertarian, before they became the Liebetarians.  It would have been a simple matter of having the testicles to appeal to my fellow state residents by simply asking, "Do you want to keep this fat, jowly Demoncat turned Repulsican professional political party hack representing you?"  and "Do you want to replace Lauch Faircloth with another lying, cheating, thieving, conniving, shyster charlatan, lackey lawyer who is a dyed in the wool, to the depth of his soulless soul Demoncat who wants to be a professional political party hack?" The Libertarian candidate that year, Barbara Howe, didn't have the ovaries to ask.  If she had, I'd bet that she'd have gotten more than just two per cent of the vote.
The one thing that confuses me about all the money involved with this harlot of a whore and her baseborn bastard baby is why couldn't John just reach into his deep pockets and cover it himself?  He was, as he is, a multi-millionaire from his days of hoodwinking jerk brained juries by channeling dead babies and other such shenanigans that I'm sure that he made very believable, as he is the consummate prevaricator.  I'd suppose that that is why his lawyers in this case didn't put him on the stand. An attorney can't present a witness that he or she knows is going to lie and everyone knows that John Edwards can only speak by lying.   The same is probably true of his lawyer daughter, too.
I can't WAIT to see how ashamed and embarrassed I'm going to be when NC hosts the Dummycrap/ Demoncat convention in a few months.   But I WILL be proud of my state again in November when we will have learned our lesson, as we did with Jimma Carter, and award our fifteen electoral votes to someone other than the half breed, Bolshevik buffoon, Barry Soetoro.         

Obama Banned This Video. Gee, I Wonder Why?

"http://www.youtube.com/embed/l-HqHSkYG-Y"

Of course, if it's banned, how is it still on YouTube, so that I can link it here?

Here Are Some Easy Ways to Cut Spending

Most every, if not every elected official in the executive and legislative branches have a Chief of Staff.  If these officers would do their jobs, as they were hired to do, part of those job descriptions would be such that each one of them would serve as the chief of his or her staff, as Jack Kennedy was the last President to do so.  Such a personnel policy would save upwards of $100 million a year.  I once heard that that is next to nothing to the Senate Finance Committee, but it's a buttload of money to most of us.  And those staffs, without their chiefs of, would consist only of clerical/communicative administrative assistants, which were once called and paid as secretaries, bookkeepers, typists, receptionists and clerks, of varying kinds, like file and mail.  Congressional representatives would have no legislative directors, no advisers, no counsels, general or otherwise.  The President's advisers would be the principle officers in each of the executive departments, as mandated by Article 2, Section 2.  And there should be fewer of those executive departments than currently exist.  And for actually doing the work for which they were elected and appointed to do, these executives and legislators should be paid more than their current salaries, as they would actually be earning them.  And you can figure that without all of these nameless staffers to do the work, there would be a whole lot less work done, so that we wouldn't be constantly saddled with such monstrous, megamaniacal masterworks as The New Deal, The Great Society and The Fundamental Transformation, better known to the dumb masses as Social Security, Medicare/Medicaid and Obamacare. 
In recently researching my newly redistricted Congresswoman, I was looking at her committee assignments.  On one of the committee's web page is listed the committee staff, which included a director, a deputy director, several counsels of varying ranks and titles and several members of the professional staff, which are, I'd suppose, the probably necessary clerical workers.   Of course, they're not necessary, as all business of Congress should be conducted by the individual and the committee of the whole. 
I can only assume that all Congressional committees have such or similar staffs.  Until we can eliminate the long standing seniority superiority/committee construct of Congress, we can immediately eliminate all of these fancy titled positions.  As for the people laid-off from these unaccountable occupations, those with law licenses will not be eligible for unemployment benefits, because as licensed lawyers, each one of them is employed automatically and immediately by simply 'hanging out his or her shingle'.
Totally eliminating the Department of Education would lay-off about 5000 employees, while saving the taxpayers close to a hundred billion dollars annually.  While not allowing these employees to ever hold any unelected governmental job other than classroom teacher, they would be eligible for up to nine months of unemployment benefits.  The sub-cabinet level Small Business Administration would be tasked to make matching loans to any of these 'educators'  making individual and group investments in start-ups of new, private, accredited schools.
These aren't, on their own and by themselves, the ways and means to the fiscal sanity of balanced budgets and perpetual prosperity, but they're a start.