In the subsequent years, right up to present tense, there have been and are various suggestions for realigning the divisions, so that they more closely approximate the realty of their directional designations. It should be an easy matter to look at an American map and determine which teams are East, South, North and West. But in the same manner that American history is no longer accurately taught, I suppose that it is a safe assumption that American geography isn't, either.
There is recent and current talk about different teams relocating, which would throw any present day talk of proper directional reassignment moot through inaccuracy. I have heard rumors of America's second largest city and the biggest city without an NFL franchise getting a team.
Could this thought of the San Diego Chargers and the Oakland Raiders sharing a stadium in L.A. have any credence or credibility?

I hope to goodness not, because that may be absolutely one of the most ridiculous proposals I've ever heard, including Bernie Sanders for President.
There is this 'thing' called
When the league was reorganized in 2002, the assigners did mange to get one division in each conference correct, the AFC West and the NFC South. Beyond that, it looks like they've never looked at a map.
That would mean moving the Indianapolis Colts, whose current South assignment is maybe even stupider than having Dallas in the East.
And that would put the Ravens in the East to fill the void created with the reassignment of the Dolphins. And let's face it. Baltimore is about as east as East can be..
A for te NFC, let's start with the most obvious move of the Cowboys from East to West.
That would mean moving the Rams to the North and the Lions to the East. Anybody who has been in the state of Missouri in the wintertime knows that St. Louis is far more North than West and Detroit is in the Eastern Time Zone..
And that's how the NFL should be aligned, given current team locations.